.svg)
.svg)
%20(1).svg)
%20(1).svg)
.svg)
Khairi Azmi
Head of APAC
Paxos
Khairi Azmi is Head of APAC at Paxos, leading business development, partnerships, and regulatory strategy across the region's digital assets market. He brings 15+ years of institutional sales and FX experience across global markets firms, including his most recent stint at OKX, where he built the institutional business from scratch and ran the Singapore office, working closely with exchanges, banks, and regulators across APAC.
Khairi is based in Singapore with an extensive network across its crypto and fintech industries.
Speaking At
-
3:00–4:30pmTue 17 NovPublic-Private RoundtableRoundtable Room 1Open
The Scaling Challenge in Tokenized MarketsGlobal Frameworks and Shared Best Practices in Payments Chains
Enterprise Tokenized Settlement: Can Convertibility Hold Under Stress At Scale?
-
Avalon IngramDigital Assets Business LeadSwift
-
Aymeric SalleyHead of Digital Assets PlatformBanking Circle
-
Biba HomsyBoard MemberInterchain Foundation - Cosmos Lab
-
Jesse McWatersEVP, Head of Global PolicyMastercard
-
John O'NeillManaging Director, Digital Assets & Currencies, CIBHSBC
-
Jose Manuel Marques SevillanoDirector Financial Market Infrastructures & InnovationBanco de España
-
Khairi AzmiHead of APACPaxos
-
Dr. Marius SkuodisBoard MemberBank of Lithuania
-
Sunayna TutejaFormer Chief Innovation OfficerFederal Reserve SystemModerator
About this session
Tokenized money is going plural — stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits are both moving toward live enterprise use in 2026, but they hold their value at par through different mechanisms, and each faces a different test under stress. Stablecoins hold par through reserves and redemption, now being formalized by 2026 rulemaking, from the GENIUS Act to MiCA; under stress, the question is whether reserves and redemption queues hold up in a run. Tokenized deposits hold par through the existing two-tier banking system and a central bank's guarantee of convertibility, but scale through interbank plumbing that's still being decided — settlement-bank arrangements or shared platforms. Under stress, the question there is whether that plumbing, and the counterparty exposure it creates, holds up if a bank or a platform fails.
As regulators and participants warned at the Point Zero Forum, the open question is whether convertibility at par survives a crisis in practice, on any of these rails. This session asks what needs to be built at each stage — reserve or capital backing, custody or bank participation, secondary-market trading, and cross-ledger settlement — for that convertibility to hold under stress. It puts reserve-backed and deposit-backed models on equal footing: where each is already resilient, where each is still exposed, and whether a fragmented rails landscape is itself becoming the bigger risk to singleness than any one model's design.
-
