Inclusion and Diversity: Addressing Financial Exclusion in the Age of Enhanced Compliance

By Griffith University following a roundtable discussion which took place during the 2024 Japan FinTech Festival. 

August 2024

According to the World Bank Group, the Asia-Pacific region accounts for half of the world’s unbanked. This whitepaper explores how policymakers, banks and other financial institutions in the Asia-Pacific region can manage the trade-off between financial inclusion and compliance with regulations on anti-money laundering/combatting the financing of terrorism (hereinafter “AML/CFT”).

This tradeoff may manifest itself in de-banking of existing or prospective customers. In addition to undermining financial inclusion efforts, de-banking frustrates AML/CFT objectives by pressuring higher-risk transactions out of the regulated system into murkier, informal channels that are more difficult to track. 

What is de-banking?
Individuals and businesses are “de-banked” when a bank/financial institution closes their account, declines to open one or limits the types of financial services offered. Although persons can face difficulties accessing financial services for many reasons, de-banking is largely reported in situations where it is caused by AML/CFT-compliance related issues.

Opening an account with a financial institution is a key, yet potentially difficult, component of accessing financial services. One of the biggest challenges for (potential) customers of banks and other financial institutions is meeting AML/CFT requirements related to personal identification and verification. Such requirements typically entail the collection of mandatory documentation (to open an account) that certain applicants do not have and/or cannot easily obtain. 

Which international organization(s) sets standards relevant to de-banking?
In the last two to three decades, countries around the world, including in the Asia-Pacific region, have established AML/CFT frameworks based on standards issued by the Financial Action Task Force (hereinafter “FATF”). FATF and FATF-style regional bodies like the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (hereinafter “APG”), incentivize member-States to conform their frameworks to international standards by publishing “mutual evaluations” that assess the strength of the relevant jurisdiction’s AML/CFT regime.

However, with the proliferation of AML/CFT regulations, new concerns have arisen as to their effect on global efforts to eliminate poverty, including initiatives aimed at increasing access to finance for traditionally underserved and excluded populations.

 

FutureMatters is a platform for thought leaders, practitioners, and industry players to share their insights on emerging opportunities and challenges in today's world. Apply to be a contributor here.

Join our community